Bug #4664
closed
Autogenerated OS description for SLES is wrong when more then one architecture is used
Description
based on a report on IRC:
<x> We have a mixture of RHEL and SLES boxes, running on x86_64 and s390x architectures
<x> On SLES 11, the x86_64 is being assigned to the Operating System tagged s390x with architecture
<x> in seems to be fact related, since we manually re-assigned it and when puppet runs it goes back to the s390x operating system
The problem here is, that the lsbdistdescrption fact is used as the display name for the OS. It's e.g. "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64)" or "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (s390x)".
Updated by Anonymous about 11 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Ready For Testing
Updated by Anonymous about 11 years ago
- Has duplicate Bug #4665: Operating Systems autocreated by Fact Imports from SLES improperly include the Architecture in the OS Description added
Updated by Anonymous about 11 years ago
I also thought about setting the SP via the operatingsystemrelease fact, but then you would need special handling for SLES. If that is really needed, ping me, then I'll implement it.
Updated by Dominic Cleal about 11 years ago
- Translation missing: en.field_release set to 4
Updated by Anonymous about 11 years ago
- Status changed from Ready For Testing to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset c88a5e5336e1f4f45f718b42c580991a0e5bead5.
Updated by Anonymous about 11 years ago
- Related to Bug #4800: "Description has already been taken" for some new SLES clients added