Project

General

Profile

Bug #17911

Inconsistent naming of errata applicable vs affected

Added by Justin Sherrill over 2 years ago. Updated 11 months ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Low
Category:
Errata Management
Target version:
Difficulty:
Triaged:
Yes
Bugzilla link:
Team Backlog:
Fixed in Releases:
Found in Releases:

Description

Cloned from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394486

Description of problem:
In the errata menu item it is used 'Applicable'
Looking into a Content View errata tab the wording is 'Affected Content Hosts'

For me there is no difference as both return 0 when the errata is installed.

Please use consistent naming.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Associated revisions

Revision b7e0d437 (diff)
Added by Justin Sherrill over 2 years ago

Fixes #17911 - use applicable content hosts phrase

History

#1 Updated by The Foreman Bot over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Ready For Testing
  • Pull request https://github.com/Katello/katello/pull/6519 added

#2 Updated by Justin Sherrill over 2 years ago

  • Target version set to 151

#3 Updated by Justin Sherrill over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Ready For Testing to Closed
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

#4 Updated by Justin Sherrill over 2 years ago

  • Legacy Backlogs Release (now unused) set to 211

Also available in: Atom PDF