Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Bug #17911

closed

Inconsistent naming of errata applicable vs affected

Added by Justin Sherrill over 7 years ago. Updated about 6 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
Justin Sherrill
Category:
Errata Management
Target version:
Katello 3.4.0
Difficulty:
Triaged:
Bugzilla link:
1394486
Pull request:
https://github.com/Katello/katello/pull/6519
Fixed in Releases:
Found in Releases:
Red Hat JIRA:

Description

Cloned from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394486

Description of problem:
In the errata menu item it is used 'Applicable'
Looking into a Content View errata tab the wording is 'Affected Content Hosts'

For me there is no difference as both return 0 when the errata is installed.

Please use consistent naming.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by The Foreman Bot over 7 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Ready For Testing
  • Pull request https://github.com/Katello/katello/pull/6519 added
Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Justin Sherrill over 7 years ago

  • Target version set to 151
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by Justin Sherrill over 7 years ago

  • Status changed from Ready For Testing to Closed
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100
Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by Justin Sherrill over 7 years ago

  • Translation missing: en.field_release set to 211
Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF