Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #18561

closed

Slow exec of delete_removed_facts on MySQL 5.6

Added by Yakir Gibraltar over 7 years ago. Updated over 6 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Importers
Target version:
Difficulty:
Triaged:
Fixed in Releases:
Found in Releases:

Description

Hi,
I'm using MySQL 5.6 and 2657 hosts, after upgrade foreman to 1.14.1 i see bad performance from DB side on delete_removed_facts in app/models/fact_value.rb one delete take 10 sec instead 1 sec (maximum).
For example:
2017-02-19 15:16:25 04030062 [audit] [I] [461790d9.d462ad46.com] deleted 0 (9844.4ms)
2017-02-19 15:16:25 04030062 [audit] [I] [461790d9.d462ad46.com] updated 10 (126.8ms)
2017-02-19 15:16:25 04030062 [audit] [I] [461790d9.d462ad46.com] added 0 (2.1ms)

Base on https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/commit/46e1ea9f704f41afbd0373e4b8fc54313ac6b397, i reverted:
@ def delete_removed_facts
ActiveSupport::Notifications.instrument "fact_importer_deleted.foreman", :host_id => host.id, :host_name => host.name, :facts => facts, :deleted => [] do |payload| # deletes all facts using a single SQL query (with inner query)
payload[:count] = counters[:deleted] = FactValue.joins(:fact_name).where(:host => host, 'fact_names.type' => fact_name_class).where.not('fact_names.name' => facts.keys).delete_all
end
end

To:
@def delete_removed_facts
to_delete = host.fact_values.eager_load(:fact_name).where("fact_names.type = '#{fact_name_class}' AND fact_names.name NOT IN (?)", facts.keys) # N+1 DELETE SQL, but this would allow us to use callbacks (e.g. auditing) when deleting.
deleted = to_delete.destroy_all
counters[:deleted] = deleted.size
@db_facts = nil
logger.debug("Merging facts for '#{host}': deleted #{counters[:deleted]} facts")
end

After revert this change i see high performance from DB side.
Any option that someone else will test it on MySQL or improve delete_removed_facts?

Thanks!
Yakir.


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Related to Foreman - Bug #9016: Fact import code consumes lot of memoryClosedLukas Zapletal01/18/2015Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Anonymous over 7 years ago

  • Category set to Importers
Actions #2

Updated by Anonymous over 7 years ago

  • Related to Bug #9016: Fact import code consumes lot of memory added
Actions #3

Updated by Dominic Cleal over 7 years ago

  • Translation missing: en.field_release set to 221
Actions #4

Updated by Dominic Cleal over 7 years ago

  • Tracker changed from Refactor to Bug
Actions #5

Updated by Dominic Cleal over 7 years ago

  • Translation missing: en.field_release changed from 221 to 227
Actions #6

Updated by Lukas Zapletal over 7 years ago

I don't have MySQL instance handy, but what SQL does it generate? It should be pretty fast as we limit the values via `host_id` so this should bring number of rows down pretty quick. MySQL optimizer could maybe do it in incorrect order, there are three where clauses.

Actions #7

Updated by Yakir Gibraltar over 7 years ago

Lukas Zapletal wrote:

I don't have MySQL instance handy, but what SQL does it generate? It should be pretty fast as we limit the values via `host_id` so this should bring number of rows down pretty quick. MySQL optimizer could maybe do it in incorrect order, there are three where clauses.

The old version executed (fast transaction):
SELECT `fact_values`.`id` AS t0_r0,
`fact_values`.`value` AS t0_r1,
`fact_values`.`fact_name_id` AS t0_r2,
`fact_values`.`host_id` AS t0_r3,
`fact_values`.`updated_at` AS t0_r4,
`fact_values`.`created_at` AS t0_r5,
`fact_names`.`id` AS t1_r0,
`fact_names`.`name` AS t1_r1,
`fact_names`.`updated_at` AS t1_r2,
`fact_names`.`created_at` AS t1_r3,
`fact_names`.`compose` AS t1_r4,
`fact_names`. `short_name` AS t1_r5,
`fact_names`.`type` AS t1_r6,
`fact_names`.`ancestry` AS t1_r7
FROM `fact_values`
LEFT OUTER JOIN `fact_names`
ON `fact_names`.`id` = `fact_values`.`fact_name_id`
WHERE `fact_values`. `host_id` = 2309436
AND ( fact_names.type = 'PuppetFactName'
AND fact_names.name NOT IN (
'environment', 'processor4', 'operatingsystem',
'bmc_subnet','rvm_installed', 'interfaces',
'blockdevice_sdb_size', 'processor1',
'mounted _filesystems', 'os', 'ipmi_lan_channel', 'mtu_bond0',
'swapsize_mb', 'ipmi_ipaddress', 'package_provider', 'concat_basedir',
'bmc_mac', 'swapfree', 'ipmi1_lan_channel', 'macaddress_eth0',
'bios_release_date', 'staging_http_ge t', 'sshrsakey', 'clientnoop',
'system_uptime', 'memoryfree', 'processor37', 'main_interface',
'uuid', 'swapsize', 'postgres_default_version', 'mco_version',
'selinux_config_mode', 'swapfile_sizes', 'puppetversion', 'processor 34',
'processor28', 'bios_version', 'processor31', 'processor19',
'productname', 'processor25', 'facterversion', 'processor16',
'service_provider', 'processor22', 'uptime', 'blockdevice_sda_vendor',
'is_pe', 'megaraid_adapters ', 'processor13', 'filesystems',
'is_virtual', 'processor10', '_timestamp', 'processor8',
'macaddress', 'ipmi1_ipaddress', 'hostname', 'serialnumber',
'selinux', 'processor5', 'kernelmajversion', 'uptime_hours',
'uniqueid', 'mtu …...' ) )
DELETE FROM `fact_values` WHERE `fact_values`.`id` = 410225436

The new version executing (long transaction):
DELETE FROM `fact_values`
WHERE `fact_values`.`id` = (SELECT `fact_values`.`id` AS t0_r0,
`fact_values`.`value` AS t0_r1,
`fact_values`.`fact_name_id` AS t0_r2,
`fact_values`.`host_id` AS t0_r3,
`fact_values`.`updated_at` AS t0_r4,
`fact_values`.`created_at` AS t0_r5,
`fact_names`.`id` AS t1_r0,
`fact_names`.`name` AS t1_r1,
`fact_names`.`updated_at` AS t1_r2,
`fact_names`.`created_at` AS t1_r3,
`fact_names`.`compose` AS t1_r4,
`fact_names`. `short_name` AS t1_r5,
`fact_names`.`type` AS t1_r6,
`fact_names`.`ancestry` AS t1_r7
FROM `fact_values`
LEFT OUTER JOIN `fact_names`
ON `fact_names`.`id` =
`fact_values`.`fact_name_id`
WHERE
`fact_values`. `host_id` = 2309436
AND ( fact_names.type = 'PuppetFactName'
AND fact_names.name NOT IN (
'environment', 'processor4', 'operatingsystem', 'bmc_subnet',
'rvm_installed', 'interfaces', 'blockdevice_sdb_size', 'processor1',
'mounted _filesystems', 'os', 'ipmi_lan_channel', 'mtu_bond0',
'swapsize_mb', 'ipmi_ipaddress', 'package_provider', 'concat_basedir',
'bmc_mac', 'swapfree', 'ipmi1_lan_channel', 'macaddress_eth0',
'bios_release_date', 'staging_http_ge t', 'sshrsakey', 'clientnoop',
'system_uptime', 'memoryfree', 'processor37', 'main_interface',
'uuid', 'swapsize', 'postgres_default_version', 'mco_version',
'selinux_config_mode', 'swapfile_sizes', 'puppetversion', 'processor 34',
'processor28', 'bios_version', 'processor31', 'processor19',
'productname', 'processor25', 'facterversion', 'processor16',
'service_provider', 'processor22', 'uptime', 'blockdevice_sda_vendor',
'is_pe', 'megaraid_adapters ', 'processor13', 'filesystems',
'is_virtual', 'processor10', '_timestamp', 'processor8' ,
'macaddress', 'ipmi1_ipaddress', 'hostname', 'serialnumber',
'selinux', 'processor5', 'kernel…...' )))

I tried to collects stats and analyze all foreman schema and it not solved the problem.
I saw few ideas to improve the delete, instead nested subquery:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/17100006
http://stackoverflow.com/a/7361345
http://dba.stackexchange.com/a/71233

Actions #8

Updated by Lukas Zapletal over 7 years ago

I understand, problem is that we are using Rails AR DSL which does not allow to do DELETE FROM and JOINS together. We traded inner query for much more memory effective code.

I think the best way is to file a PR that will do the delete with join but in SQL so no inner query is used. You cannot use delete_all(where) for that, you need to render the SQL manually with to_sql.

Actions #9

Updated by The Foreman Bot over 7 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Ready For Testing
  • Assignee set to Lukas Zapletal
  • Pull request https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/4431 added
Actions #10

Updated by Lukas Zapletal over 7 years ago

Hmmm looks like this is not possible in Rails, the code would be very ugly. See my patch, can you try it?

Actions #11

Updated by Dominic Cleal over 7 years ago

  • Translation missing: en.field_release deleted (227)
Actions #12

Updated by Yakir Gibraltar over 7 years ago

Lukas Zapletal wrote:

Hmmm looks like this is not possible in Rails, the code would be very ugly. See my patch, can you try it?

Thanks @Lukas Zapletal , i'll try tomorrow to commit https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/4431 on our foreman.

Actions #13

Updated by Yakir Gibraltar over 7 years ago

Yakir Gibraltar wrote:

Lukas Zapletal wrote:

Hmmm looks like this is not possible in Rails, the code would be very ugly. See my patch, can you try it?

Thanks @Lukas Zapletal , i'll try tomorrow to commit https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/4431 on our foreman.

@tbriske added few changes , let me know which PR i can test on our env.

Actions #14

Updated by Yakir Gibraltar over 7 years ago

@Lukas Zapletal, i tested your PR and it's fixed the issue.

Actions #15

Updated by Lukas Zapletal over 7 years ago

  • Status changed from Ready For Testing to Closed
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100
Actions #16

Updated by Dominic Cleal over 7 years ago

  • Translation missing: en.field_release set to 241
Actions #17

Updated by Daniel Lobato Garcia about 7 years ago

  • Translation missing: en.field_release changed from 241 to 276
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF