Project

General

Profile

Feature #18618

Use Dynflow as an ActiveJob backend

Added by Daniel Lobato Garcia over 1 year ago. Updated 2 months ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Notifications
Target version:
Difficulty:
Triaged:
Bugzilla link:
Team Backlog:
Fixed in Releases:
Found in Releases:

Description

For several backend tasks, we can write jobs using ActiveJob API (very simple), but the executor we had is Dynflow which did not support ActiveJob. This changed with https://github.com/Dynflow/dynflow/pull/216 , so Foreman should take advantage of that and initialize a Dynflow world to be used in its jobs.

A good first place where this could be used is on recurring jobs that need notifications.


Related issues

Related to foreman-tasks - Feature #8130: Add support of async puppet / chef report processingNew2014-10-28
Related to Foreman - Bug #20908: Postpone the initialization of dynflowClosed2017-09-12
Related to foreman-tasks - Bug #18673: Remove initialization code in favor of DynflowClosed2017-02-24

Associated revisions

Revision 1ed59c63 (diff)
Added by Daniel Lobato Garcia about 1 year ago

Fixes #18618 - Use Dynflow as an ActiveJob backend

This commit initializes the Dynflow world in a very similar manner to
foreman-tasks (if a Dynflow world is available from foreman-tasks, we
use that one).

History

#1 Updated by The Foreman Bot over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from New to Ready For Testing
  • Assignee set to Daniel Lobato Garcia
  • Pull request https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/4316 added

#2 Updated by Michael Moll over 1 year ago

  • Related to Feature #8130: Add support of async puppet / chef report processing added

#3 Updated by Anonymous about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from Ready For Testing to Closed
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

#4 Updated by Marek Hulán about 1 year ago

  • Legacy Backlogs Release (now unused) set to 240

#5 Updated by Ivan Necas about 1 year ago

  • Related to Bug #20908: Postpone the initialization of dynflow added

#6 Updated by Ivan Necas about 1 year ago

  • Related to Bug #18673: Remove initialization code in favor of Dynflow added

Also available in: Atom PDF