Actions
Bug #1998
open
Nested hostgroup inheritance should be reflected on Location / Organization
Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Organizations and Locations
Target version:
-
Description
With hostgroup A and hostgroup A/B,
if I grant hostgroup A to org 1
I think that hostgroup A/B should automaticaly
be granted to org 1 also.
Thoughts ?
Updated by Ohad Levy about 12 years ago
- Category set to Organizations and Locations
- Assignee set to Amos Benari
- Target version set to 1.1
Updated by Ohad Levy almost 12 years ago
- Target version deleted (
1.1)
Is that really the right behavior ? e.g. in both cases (when just including A or B in an org) someone might want to allow or disallow that... e.g. it depends on the context?
Updated by Dominic Cleal over 9 years ago
- Related to Bug #2234: Parent hostgroups should be assigned to same location as children added
Updated by Dominic Cleal over 9 years ago
- Related to Bug #4595: hostgroup parents are not scoped to the current taxonomy added
Updated by Dominic Cleal over 9 years ago
- Related to Bug #5419: Bad behavior when a host_group is in a location/organization that its parent is not added
Updated by Dominic Cleal about 9 years ago
- Related to Bug #12558: Host from child organization cannot be saved if hostgroup is defined for parent org only. added
Updated by Dominic Cleal about 9 years ago
- Related to deleted (Bug #12558: Host from child organization cannot be saved if hostgroup is defined for parent org only.)
Actions