Bug #20762
`hammer content-view filter rule info` requires --content-view-filter-id when specifying --id
Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Content Views
Target version:
Description
$ hammer content-view filter rule info --id 13
Error: Could not find content_view_filter, please set one of options --content-view-filter, --content-view-filter-id.
ID is unique and shouldn't require the filter ID.
History
#1
Updated by John Mitsch over 4 years ago
- Legacy Backlogs Release (now unused) set to 250
#2
Updated by Andrew Kofink over 4 years ago
- Assignee set to Andrew Kofink
#3
Updated by Andrew Kofink over 4 years ago
- Status changed from New to Rejected
- Legacy Backlogs Release (now unused) deleted (
250)
Actually, since ContentViewFilterRule objects come from 4 different tables/models (ContentViewPackageFilterRule, ContentViewPackageGroupFilterRule, ContentViewErratumFilterRule, and ContentViewDockerFilterRule), id is not unique, so the filter ID is required.
#4
Updated by Justin Sherrill over 4 years ago
- Legacy Backlogs Release (now unused) set to 166