Bug #20762: `hammer content-view filter rule info` requires --content-view-filter-id when specifying --id - Katello - Foreman

Actions

Copy link

Bug #20762

closed

`hammer content-view filter rule info` requires --content-view-filter-id when specifying --id

Added by Andrew Kofink almost 8 years ago. Updated almost 7 years ago.

Status:

Rejected

Priority:

Normal

Assignee:

Andrew Kofink

Category:

Content Views

Target version:

Katello Recycle Bin

Difficulty:

trivial

Triaged:

Bugzilla link:

Pull request:

Fixed in Releases:

Found in Releases:

Red Hat JIRA:

Description

$ hammer content-view filter rule info --id 13
Error: Could not find content_view_filter, please set one of options --content-view-filter, --content-view-filter-id.

ID is unique and shouldn't require the filter ID.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by John Mitsch almost 8 years ago

Translation missing: en.field_release set to 250

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Andrew Kofink almost 8 years ago

Assignee set to Andrew Kofink

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Andrew Kofink almost 8 years ago

Status changed from New to Rejected
Translation missing: en.field_release deleted (~~250~~)

Actually, since ContentViewFilterRule objects come from 4 different tables/models (ContentViewPackageFilterRule, ContentViewPackageGroupFilterRule, ContentViewErratumFilterRule, and ContentViewDockerFilterRule), id is not unique, so the filter ID is required.

Actions

Copy link