Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #23909

closed

VMware “Could not match network interface” on VM creation

Added by Zachary Bedell over 6 years ago. Updated over 6 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Compute resources - VMware
Target version:
Difficulty:
Triaged:
No
Fixed in Releases:
Found in Releases:

Description

I’ve found an edge case where the fix for bug #19623 isn’t working. This may also relate to bug #11106. The error message is a closer fit to #11106, but the root cause looks like a variation on #19623.

As far as I can tell, the issue is caused by collisions between the id/key and ref attributes of two vCenter network objects. Our environment matches the conditions in the original bug where we’re post-vCenter migration with legacy id ref’s on the distributed virtual switches. It looks like we have an object where the ref matches the id of another object’s key.

The select_nic function in FogExtensions::Vsphere::Server (app/models/concerns/fog_extensions/vsphere/server.rb) calls all_networks.detect first with the nic_attrs structure which looks like it matches against network._ref. IE:

vm_network = all_networks.detect { |network| network._ref == nic_attrs['network'] }

Only if that doesn’t match anything would the check below it which checks for network.key execute:

vm_network ||= all_networks.detect { |network| nic_attrs['network'] && [network.name, network.try(:key)].include?(nic_attrs['network']) }

In our environment, this makes a false positive match due to one object having a ref attribute that matches the desired object’s key. I’m pretty sure the check a few lines later that compares the vm_network.name and vm_network.key nil’s out selected_nic, ultimately returning nil to match_macs_to_nics in Orchestration::Compute which then fails with “Orchestration::Compute: Could not match network interface.”

In my environment, I was able to fix the issue by reversing the search by name & key and the search for nic_attrs as in the attached patch.

I think this should be a safe change in the other cases where #19623 applies, but I’m nowhere near familiar enough with the Foreman codebase to be certain of that.


Files

foreman-vcenter67-network.patch foreman-vcenter67-network.patch 959 Bytes Zachary Bedell, 06/12/2018 03:33 PM
Actions #1

Updated by The Foreman Bot over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Ready For Testing
  • Pull request https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/5685 added
Actions #2

Updated by Timo Goebel over 6 years ago

  • Translation missing: en.field_release set to 353
Actions #3

Updated by Zachary Bedell over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Ready For Testing to Closed
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100
Actions #4

Updated by Tomer Brisker over 6 years ago

  • Triaged set to No
  • Fixed in Releases 1.17.2, 1.18.1 added
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF