Plugins » Katello

Clone from bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186713

Description of problem:
This issue is similar to bug #1957035. We fixed it for content view promotion but not for content view publish.

If the current location of the user who triggered the content view publish task doesn't match the location of one or more hosts subscribed to the publishing content view, then the error will be raised.

How reproducible:
Easy

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a content view and attach a RHEL 7 repo to it. Publish the CV
2. In web UI, subscribe a content host in Organization 'A' and Location 'B' to the CV.
3. In the Web UI, set your current Organization as 'A' and current Location as 'C'.
4. Publish the content view.

Actual results:

47: Actions::Katello::ContentView::Publish (skipped) [ 0.30s / 0.30s ]
Error:

NoMethodError

undefined method `get_status' for nil:NilClass

---
- "/usr/share/gems/gems/katello-4.5.0.24/app/models/katello/host/content_facet.rb:220:in
`update_errata_status'"
- "/usr/share/gems/gems/katello-4.5.0.24/app/lib/actions/katello/content_view/publish.rb:118:in
`block in finalize'"
- "/usr/share/gems/gems/activerecord-6.0.6/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:88:in
`each'"
- "/usr/share/gems/gems/activerecord-6.0.6/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb:88:in
`each'"
- "/usr/share/gems/gems/katello-4.5.0.24/app/lib/actions/katello/content_view/publish.rb:116:in
`finalize'"
- "/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-1.6.4/lib/dynflow/action.rb:604:in `block (2 levels)
in execute_finalize'"
- "/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-1.6.4/lib/dynflow/middleware/stack.rb:27:in `pass'"
- "/usr/share/gems/gems/dynflow-1.6.4/lib/dynflow/middleware.rb:19:in `pass'"
- "/usr/share/gems/gems/foreman-tasks-6.0.3/app/lib/actions/middleware/rails_executor_wrap.rb:20:in
`block in finalize'"
- "/usr/share/gems/gems/activesupport-6.0.6/lib/active_support/execution_wrapper.rb:91:in
`wrap'"
- "/usr/share/gems/gems/foreman-tasks-6.0.3/app/lib/actions/middleware/rails_executor_wrap.rb:19:in
`finalize'"

Expected results:
No error

Additional info:

It is NOT a duplicate of bug #2147579