Bug #4337
open
EC2 use block device mapping
Description
EC2 instances can have a block device mapping to EBS volumes, as per http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/block-device-mapping-concepts.html
We should be able to design this block device mapping in Foreman and set ephemeral disks for the EC2 instances too.
Originally from: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/foreman-dev/TbXtZ5fmyrc/Gbf-WQcn3HsJ
Updated by Dominic Cleal almost 11 years ago
- Status changed from New to Assigned
- Assignee set to Daniel Lobato Garcia
- Target version set to 1.9.1
Updated by Daniel Lobato Garcia almost 11 years ago
- Target version changed from 1.9.1 to 1.9.0
Same feature in Openstack tracked here: http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/4521
Updated by Daniel Lobato Garcia almost 11 years ago
It will easily get done after #4521 is closed, for the moment I'm focusing on that and waiting for a test EC2 account
Updated by Dominic Cleal almost 11 years ago
- Related to Bug #4521: Openstack boot from volume added
Updated by Anonymous
Updated by Dominic Cleal about 10 years ago
- Category changed from Compute resources to Compute resources - EC2
Updated by Dominic Cleal about 10 years ago
- Related to Feature #3022: Set disk size of ec2 instance from "Virtual Machine" tab of UI added
Updated by Dominic Cleal about 10 years ago
- Related to Feature #7072: More EC2 Integration added
Updated by Dominic Cleal almost 10 years ago
- Related to Bug #9550: unable to provision vm in rackspace using the compute or memory flavor added
Updated by Andrew Cooper over 5 years ago
Is this feature dead? Based on associated bugs/tickets it looks like fog might have introduced new capabilities to support more customization around boot volumes size/types. We just attempted to hook up 1.20 foreman to AWS and found this to be show stopping.
Updated by Adam Cécile about 5 years ago
Sadly it seems so yes, it's been two years since I sent an empiric patch to raise default size here: https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/3022 and nothing has been done since.
I looked already a bit into integrating up to the creation form but ruby syntax is ways too "weird" and I don't think I'm going to make it...