Bug #4664
closed
Autogenerated OS description for SLES is wrong when more then one architecture is used
Added by Anonymous about 11 years ago.
Updated over 6 years ago.
Description
based on a report on IRC:
<x> We have a mixture of RHEL and SLES boxes, running on x86_64 and s390x architectures
<x> On SLES 11, the x86_64 is being assigned to the Operating System tagged s390x with architecture
<x> in seems to be fact related, since we manually re-assigned it and when puppet runs it goes back to the s390x operating system
The problem here is, that the lsbdistdescrption fact is used as the display name for the OS. It's e.g. "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64)" or "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (s390x)".
- Status changed from Assigned to Ready For Testing
- Target version set to 1.9.0
- Has duplicate Bug #4665: Operating Systems autocreated by Fact Imports from SLES improperly include the Architecture in the OS Description added
I also thought about setting the SP via the operatingsystemrelease fact, but then you would need special handling for SLES. If that is really needed, ping me, then I'll implement it.
- Translation missing: en.field_release set to 4
- Status changed from Ready For Testing to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
- Related to Bug #4800: "Description has already been taken" for some new SLES clients added
Also available in: Atom
PDF