Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Bug #4841

closed

Package Foreman in its own SCL

Added by Dominic Cleal about 11 years ago. Updated almost 7 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Dominic Cleal
Category:
RPMs
Target version:
1.10.0
Difficulty:
Triaged:
Bugzilla link:
Pull request:
https://github.com/theforeman/foreman-packaging/pull/249
Fixed in Releases:
Found in Releases:
Red Hat JIRA:

Description

We really shouldn't be building packages inside the 'ruby193' software collection, but instead should have our own software collection (say, 'foreman') which depends upon ruby193.

Generally the provided SCLs aren't intended to have packages added to, or we could cause conflicts (e.g. ruby193-passenger is in RHSCL 1.1 but not 1.0, yet we provide it) and it will make it much harder for us to migrate to new SCLs (e.g. ruby200 and ror40) as all of our package names change.

Some docs on this are here:
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/2/html-single/Software_Collections_Guide/index.html#sect-The_Software_Collections_Prefix
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/2/html-single/Software_Collections_Guide/index.html#chap-Extending_Red_Hat_Software_Collections

Related issues 4 (0 open — 4 closed)

Related to Installer - Bug #8371: foreman-installer tries to install foreman-release-scl on Ubuntu after upgrade from 1.6.2 to 1.7rc1Resolved11/12/2014Actions
Related to Foreman - Bug #13803: Foreman-debug does not report SCL correctlyClosedDominic Cleal02/19/2016Actions
Blocks Packaging - Feature #7228: Rebuild packages under ror41/ruby22 SCLsClosedDominic Cleal08/22/2014Actions
Blocked by Packaging - Refactor #7234: SCL 1.1 builds needed for EL rebuilds (CentOS, SL)ClosedDominic Cleal08/22/2014Actions
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Dominic Cleal about 11 years ago

  • Related to Feature #4451: Build all ruby193 dependencies for EL7 added
Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Dominic Cleal about 11 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by Dominic Cleal about 11 years ago

Started work on this in https://github.com/domcleal/foreman-packaging/tree/rpm/develop-fmrb modelled on ror40 (which is built on ruby200), but it'll depend on RHSCL 1.1 to work for the ruby193-scldevel package

Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by Dominic Cleal almost 11 years ago

  • Related to deleted (Feature #4451: Build all ruby193 dependencies for EL7)
Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by Dominic Cleal over 10 years ago

  • Blocks Feature #7228: Rebuild packages under ror41/ruby22 SCLs added
Actions
Copy link
 #7

Updated by Dominic Cleal over 10 years ago

  • Blocked by Refactor #7234: SCL 1.1 builds needed for EL rebuilds (CentOS, SL) added
Actions
Copy link
 #8

Updated by Ronald van Zantvoort over 10 years ago

  • Related to Bug #8371: foreman-installer tries to install foreman-release-scl on Ubuntu after upgrade from 1.6.2 to 1.7rc1 added
Actions
Copy link
 #9

Updated by The Foreman Bot over 10 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Ready For Testing
  • Pull request https://github.com/theforeman/foreman-packaging/pull/249 added
Actions
Copy link
 #10

Updated by Dominic Cleal almost 10 years ago

Actions
Copy link
 #11

Updated by Dominic Cleal almost 10 years ago

Actions
Copy link
 #12

Updated by Dominic Cleal over 9 years ago

  • Category set to RPMs
  • Status changed from Ready For Testing to Closed
  • Assignee set to Dominic Cleal
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100
  • Translation missing: en.field_release set to 63

PR merged, packages are rebuilding. Status on the bottom of the PR and on foreman-dev.

Actions
Copy link
 #13

Updated by Dominic Cleal about 9 years ago

  • Related to Bug #13803: Foreman-debug does not report SCL correctly added
Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF