Feature #5374
Archive hosts so they can be hidden from the main UI
Description
Archiving:
As a user I should be able to check a box that marks a system as
"archived" which hides it from the normal registered systems list.
Back-end:
Systems that are archived should not have any subscription accounting,
auto attaching or reporting done against them.
Reporting/Auditing:
As a user I should be able to view a list of archived systems in one
place and be able to search them by the last recorded facts (ex:
hostname, fqdn, ip address, etc)
Related issues
History
#1
Updated by Mike McCune over 8 years ago
- Triaged changed from No to Yes
#2
Updated by Ohad Levy over 8 years ago
is this a foreman feature, katello or both?
Can we wait with this functionality after we unify host/systems in foreman/katello?
#3
Updated by Erik Jacobs over 8 years ago
Ohad Levy wrote:
is this a foreman feature, katello or both?
Can we wait with this functionality after we unify host/systems in foreman/katello?
It's a bit of both. The puppet/Foreman history of a system is also something that ideally should be archive-able as well. Waiting for unification seems logical.
#4
Updated by Eric Helms almost 8 years ago
- Subject changed from [RFE] Archive hosts so they can be hidden from the main UI to Archive hosts so they can be hidden from the main UI
- Legacy Backlogs Release (now unused) deleted (
14) - Difficulty set to medium
#5
Updated by Eric Helms almost 7 years ago
- Related to Tracker #8161: Host Unification added
#6
Updated by Eric Helms almost 7 years ago
- Related to deleted (Tracker #8161: Host Unification)
#7
Updated by Eric Helms almost 7 years ago
- Blocked by Tracker #8161: Host Unification added
#8
Updated by Eric Helms over 6 years ago
- Legacy Backlogs Release (now unused) set to 114
#9
Updated by John Mitsch almost 3 years ago
- Target version deleted (
Katello Backlog) - Status changed from New to Rejected
Thanks for reporting this issue. This issue was created over 4 years ago and hasn't seen an update in 1 year. We are closing this in an effort to keep a realistic backlog. Please open up a new issue that includes a link to this issue if you feel this still needs to be addressed. We can then triage the new issue and reassess.