Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #7784

closed

As a fortello user, I want to be able to install fortello without docker functionality

Added by David Davis about 10 years ago. Updated over 6 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Container
Target version:
Difficulty:
Triaged:
Fixed in Releases:
Found in Releases:

Related issues 2 (0 open2 closed)

Related to Katello - Feature #9413: Create an API by which katello plugins can add content types to katelloRejectedActions
Blocks Katello - Tracker #7125: Docker Content SupportClosedDavid Davis

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by David Davis about 10 years ago

  • Tracker changed from Bug to Feature
Actions #2

Updated by David Davis about 10 years ago

Actions #3

Updated by David Davis almost 10 years ago

Actions #4

Updated by David Davis almost 10 years ago

Actions #6

Updated by David Davis almost 10 years ago

From #9406:

Right now rubygem-katello requires %{?scl_prefix}rubygem-foreman_docker which causes the Docker functionality to be installed in all cases Katello is installed.

We need to support katello-sam which does not include Docker Content management or provisioning.

1) need to have this requirement hang off the 'katello' meta RPM and not the rubygem if we want main Katello to require it

2) need to ensure that the Content -> Docker Tags menu item does not show up if the foreman_docker plugin is not installed

Actions #7

Updated by David Davis almost 10 years ago

  • Priority changed from Low to Normal
  • Translation missing: en.field_release set to 23
  • Bugzilla link set to 1193236
Actions #8

Updated by David Davis almost 10 years ago

Justin's comment in http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/9406#note-4:

Wouldn't this involve making the docker aspect of katello plugable as well?

I can't imagine even the migrations will work properly in its current state.

Actions #9

Updated by David Davis almost 10 years ago

  • Assignee set to David Davis
Actions #10

Updated by Mike McCune almost 10 years ago

I accidentally deleted the referenced issue, apologies. we can use this issue to track since it was there originally.

Actions #11

Updated by David Davis almost 10 years ago

I'm not sure what to do about the migrations. Would we:

1. Move the katello docker migrations into the katello_docker plugin but then we'd have to find any code in Katello that refers to docker columns and fence it off.
2. Leave the katello docker migrations in Katello but we'd still have to require foreman_docker as our migrations depend on those. I guess we could fence them off (check if we have katello_docker).

In addition, 2 would mean that you couldn't add katello_docker after the fact.

Actions #12

Updated by David Davis almost 10 years ago

  • Related to Feature #9413: Create an API by which katello plugins can add content types to katello added
Actions #13

Updated by Eric Helms over 9 years ago

  • Translation missing: en.field_release changed from 23 to 31
Actions #14

Updated by Eric Helms over 9 years ago

  • Translation missing: en.field_release deleted (31)
  • Triaged changed from No to Yes
Actions #15

Updated by Eric Helms almost 9 years ago

  • Translation missing: en.field_release set to 114
Actions #16

Updated by Thomas McKay over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Rejected
  • Translation missing: en.field_release changed from 114 to 166

old issue

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF