Project

General

Profile

Bug #7897

rhscl-* packages unsigned

Added by Dominic Cleal almost 5 years ago. Updated about 1 year ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
RPMs
Target version:
Difficulty:
Triaged:
Bugzilla link:
Pull request:
Team Backlog:
Fixed in Releases:
Found in Releases:

Description

The rhscl-* release packages I added in #7234 aren't getting signed with our usual release process, which only signs RPMs contained in Koji.

This probably just means amending the release process somehow, but we should also fix foreman-bats to use GPG checking.


Related issues

Related to Packaging - Refactor #7234: SCL 1.1 builds needed for EL rebuilds (CentOS, SL)Closed2014-08-22
Has duplicate Foreman - Bug #8506: foreman-release-scl RPM is not signed with GPG keyDuplicate

History

#1 Updated by Dominic Cleal almost 5 years ago

  • Related to Refactor #7234: SCL 1.1 builds needed for EL rebuilds (CentOS, SL) added

#2 Updated by Dominic Cleal almost 5 years ago

  • Target version set to 1.7.2

#3 Updated by Dominic Cleal almost 5 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Assigned
  • Assignee set to Dominic Cleal

#4 Updated by Dominic Cleal almost 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Assigned to Closed
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

Changed mash script to cache the files in /mnt/koji/releases/extras, which means we can now replace the cached files with signed copies on each release.

Added documentation to http://projects.theforeman.org/projects/foreman/wiki/RPM_Packaging#Repo-signing

#5 Updated by Dominic Cleal over 4 years ago

  • Has duplicate Bug #8506: foreman-release-scl RPM is not signed with GPG key added

Also available in: Atom PDF