Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #17911

closed

Inconsistent naming of errata applicable vs affected

Added by Justin Sherrill over 7 years ago. Updated almost 6 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Low
Category:
Errata Management
Target version:
Difficulty:
Triaged:
Fixed in Releases:
Found in Releases:

Description

Cloned from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394486

Description of problem:
In the errata menu item it is used 'Applicable'
Looking into a Content View errata tab the wording is 'Affected Content Hosts'

For me there is no difference as both return 0 when the errata is installed.

Please use consistent naming.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF