Actions
Bug #17911
closedInconsistent naming of errata applicable vs affected
Status:
Closed
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
Category:
Errata Management
Target version:
Description
Cloned from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394486
Description of problem:
In the errata menu item it is used 'Applicable'
Looking into a Content View errata tab the wording is 'Affected Content Hosts'
For me there is no difference as both return 0 when the errata is installed.
Please use consistent naming.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Actions