Bug #9366
closedHost limit should not be required field
Description
host limit is not marked as mandatory variable with (*).Also, If I set the host_limit blank, UI raises error "is not a number". which is misleading.
Description of problem:
On 'Discovery_rule page, host limit should be marked as mandatory variable with (*).
If I set the host_limit blank, UI raises error "is not a number".
which is misleading. I set the host_limit blank, so Ideally UI should raise error: Host_limit can't be blank.
In short Host_limit should be consistent with Priority field.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Satellite-6.1.0-RHEL-6-20150205.0
Sat6.1 Beta snap1 compose3
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. create a discovery rule with blank host_limit
2.
3.
See the BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190323 for more info and a screenshot.
Valid bug, we should not insist on entering a number and silently default to "0" when not provided (0 - no limit).