Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #93

closed

Display host group in listing when unattended is disabled

Added by Martin Englund about 15 years ago. Updated over 14 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Unattended installations
Target version:
-
Difficulty:
Triaged:
Fixed in Releases:
Found in Releases:

Description

When you disable unattended mode, displaying the "Operating System" column isn't useful, instead a "Hostgroup" should be used.

Should be done after refector #92

Actions #2

Updated by Ohad Levy almost 15 years ago

can you merge/rebase your master to my master?
I would prefer it to merge cleanly :)

Thanks

Actions #3

Updated by Martin Englund almost 15 years ago

I know! I botched the commit, but could not edit the post (that's why I asked for developer access)

I'm trying to figure out the best way to undo the change and commit it without the extra line.

Actions #4

Updated by Ohad Levy almost 15 years ago

Martin Englund wrote:

I know! I botched the commit, but could not edit the post (that's why I asked for developer access)

I'm trying to figure out the best way to undo the change and commit it without the extra line.

I'll create a new branch, from my master and rebase your master (I think)

Actions #6

Updated by Ohad Levy almost 15 years ago

I would display the hostgroup by default (e.g. with our without "build / unattended" support)

Actions #7

Updated by Martin Englund almost 15 years ago

So with unattended support it would be:
Name, Operating System, Hostgroup, Environment & Last report
while with unattended support disabled it would be:
Name, Hostgroup, Puppet classes, Environment & Last report

Actions #8

Updated by Ohad Levy almost 15 years ago

Martin Englund wrote:

So with unattended support it would be:
Name, Operating System, Hostgroup, Environment & Last report
while with unattended support disabled it would be:
Name, Hostgroup, Puppet classes, Environment & Last report

sounds about right :)

Actions #9

Updated by Ohad Levy almost 15 years ago

  • Target version set to 0.1-3
Actions #10

Updated by Martin Englund almost 15 years ago

Patch on the way, I'm just trying to get aligned with your code. Which branch should I aim for? master or next?

Actions #11

Updated by Ohad Levy almost 15 years ago

Martin Englund wrote:

Patch on the way, I'm just trying to get aligned with your code. Which branch should I aim for? master or next?

master, I'll create a dev / patches howto in the wiki :)

Actions #12

Updated by Ohad Levy almost 15 years ago

  • Target version changed from 0.1-3 to 0.1-4
Actions #13

Updated by Ohad Levy over 14 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Rejected

the whole host pages will be redone upon next release (current NO_AS branch), therefor I'm rejecting this ticket

Actions #14

Updated by Ohad Levy over 14 years ago

  • Target version deleted (0.1-4)
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF