Bug #14750
closedforeman proxy still running on port 8000 needlessly.
Description
Cloned from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248665
Description of problem:
Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237092
templates on the default server were turned off, which is expected. However, foreman-proxy is still listening on port 8000.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Snap 15
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install satellite
2. `lsof -i :8000`
Actual results:
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
ruby 23526 foreman-proxy 9u IPv4 108908 0t0 TCP *:irdmi (LISTEN)
Expected results:
foreman-proxy should not be listening needlessly on port 8000
Additional info:
Updated by Dominic Cleal over 8 years ago
- Status changed from New to Need more information
Can you provide more information? If the foreman_proxy http/http_port parameters are enabled then it will be running on HTTP. What did you set them to?
Updated by Ondřej Pražák over 8 years ago
Dominic Cleal wrote:
Can you provide more information? If the foreman_proxy http/http_port parameters are enabled then it will be running on HTTP. What did you set them to?
I did not touch them at all. From the BZ ticket I gathered the proxy is running on http 8000 by default and it should not. I reproduced with 'steps to reproduce' and found out the :http_port in /etc/foreman-proxy/settings.yml is not commented out.
Updated by Dominic Cleal over 8 years ago
- Project changed from Installer to Katello
- Status changed from Need more information to New
Moving this to Katello then, perhaps it enables the parameter - foreman-installer does not.
Updated by Christian Ehart over 8 years ago
Small Recommendation, would it not be better to listen on other port like "9000" instead of "9090"? Of course I can do it manually, but a predefined setup would be better...
Reason: Cockpit uses already the port 9090, see https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/foreman-users/9090/foreman-users/QEAQjGs1exQ/temrvqXFBQAJ
more details via Google: https://www.google.at/search?q=cockpit+9090&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=7RAZV5CPLKvEgAaokproBw
Updated by Ondřej Pražák over 8 years ago
Christian Ehart wrote:
Small Recommendation, would it not be better to listen on other port like "9000" instead of "9090"? Of course I can do it manually, but a predefined setup would be better...
Reason: Cockpit uses already the port 9090, see https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/foreman-users/9090/foreman-users/QEAQjGs1exQ/temrvqXFBQAJ
more details via Google: https://www.google.at/search?q=cockpit+9090&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=7RAZV5CPLKvEgAaokproBw
If there is a clash then maybe it would be better to change it. Could you file a new issue?
Updated by The Foreman Bot over 8 years ago
- Status changed from New to Ready For Testing
- Pull request https://github.com/Katello/katello-installer/pull/328 added
Updated by Eric Helms over 8 years ago
- Translation missing: en.field_release set to 143
Updated by Ondřej Pražák over 8 years ago
- Status changed from Ready For Testing to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset katello-installer|01635aa25b4b0642804efc33ce33b9b3eaeefda0.